<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Impactt Ltd &#187; employment-law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impacttlimited.com/tag/employment-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impacttlimited.com</link>
	<description>Making what’s good for workers, work for business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UK Employment Law Update: Changes to Interpretation of Rest Break Requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.impacttlimited.com/2008/11/14/uk-employment-law-update-changes-to-interpretation-of-rest-break-requirements</link>
		<comments>http://www.impacttlimited.com/2008/11/14/uk-employment-law-update-changes-to-interpretation-of-rest-break-requirements#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Blacklock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment-appeals-tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rest-breaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working-hours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impacttlimited.com/2008/11/14/uk-employment-law-update-changes-to-interpretation-of-rest-break-requirements/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the 22nd October, the UK Employment Appeals Tribunal passed a judgement which changed the established understanding of workers&#8217; entitlement to rest breaks. The judgement states that workers are entitled to a 20-minute unpaid break when they work over 6 hours, rather than being entitled to a 20-minute break for every 6 hours that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the 22<sup>nd</sup> October, the UK Employment Appeals Tribunal <a href="http://www.workplacelaw.net/news/display/id/17356">passed a judgement</a> which changed the established understanding of workers&#8217; entitlement to rest breaks.</p>
<p>The judgement states that workers are entitled to a 20-minute unpaid break when they work over 6 hours, rather than being entitled to a 20-minute break for every 6 hours that they work.</p>
<p>In practice this means a worker who works 12 hours is not entitled to two breaks totalling 40 minutes; they are only entitled to one 20-minute break.</p>
<p>This will be of specific interest to companies who are responsible for assessing compliance with UK law, such as retailers and audit companies.</p>
<p>The effect of the decision is that the maximum total number of working hours in a week is now 76 provided that person has signed an opt-out from the <a href="http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/employment/employment-legislation/working-time-regs/">Working Time Regulations</a>.  Agricultural workers are still limited to a maximum of 72 hours per week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impacttlimited.com/2008/11/14/uk-employment-law-update-changes-to-interpretation-of-rest-break-requirements/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

